🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.